Headline scores
| Platform | Total | Disclosure | Portability | Consent | Governance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 39 | 46 | 38 | 50 | |
| Blind | 58 | 62 | 41 | 64 | 60 |
| 71 | 74 | 63 | 77 | 72 | |
| Peerlist | 66 | 68 | 72 | 61 | 61 |
Detailed matrix
| Question | Blind | Peerlist | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Can a new user understand the main data categories in under ten minutes? | No | Mostly | Yes | Mostly |
| Is profile export useful outside the platform? | Partial | Weak | Partial | Strong |
| Are inferred signals explained near the feature that creates them? | Weak | Partial | Good | Partial |
| Can users separate public identity from sensitive speech? | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Moderate |
| Are connected services described clearly? | Dense | Limited | Good | Needs detail |
| Is deletion explained with receipt expectations? | Partial | Partial | Good | Partial |
| Does the platform reduce career lock-in? | No | No | Somewhat | Yes |
Method notes
Each platform was reviewed through a fictional user account, a direct reading of public policy pages, an export request where available, and a structured support inquiry. Scores reflect what users can reasonably verify, not private claims by platform staff.
Editorial conclusion: the best worker experience is usually a portfolio strategy. Keep a public profile where audiences are, keep authoritative career records somewhere you control, and export data on a schedule.